Food Distributor Valuations – June 2022

Other than in 2020, the values of publicly-traded food distributors increased over the last five fiscal years and through June 2022. The industry was adversely impacted in 2020 by reduced consumer demand in the food-service, hospitality, and travel sectors. Much of the growth in 2021 and the first six months of 2022 coincided with lighter pandemic-related restrictions and strong consumer spending. This article will examine some of the factors that appeared to have impacted the valuations of publicly-traded food distributors.

This article updates our December 31, 2021 analysis.

Important notes: This article examines potential driving factors for publicly-traded food distributor valuations from a financial statement perspective. An actual business valuation requires an in-depth analysis of the business operations and associated risk factors that are not always evident from the data on financial statements. Also, to keep the length manageable, this article will focus on what are typically perceived as primary value drivers. It will not touch on every observation in the data. Check out What is Value? and Risk and Return in the Market Approach for a quick read on the basics of risk and return and how they apply to this article.

The industry constituents for this analysis are listed below. The effective date of this analysis is June 30, 2022.

Industry constituents analyzed in this article.

Figure 1 summarizes three items for the food distributors:

  • Market value of invested capital (“MVIC”) calculated as the sum of market capitalization and interest-bearing debt;
  • Median revenues; and
  • Median earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”).

The latest fiscal year is notated “LFY” (2021), while the latest 12 months is labeled “LTM” (latest available information as of June 30, 2022).

Historical trend of enterprise values, revenue and EBITDA

Valuations generally increased over the last five fiscal years, outpacing improvements in financial performance overall. Valuations continued to grow in the LTM period, despite the broad deterioration in economic outlook and market conditions.

As was noted earlier, much of the improvement in 2021 occurred as COVID restrictions lifted and consumer spending continued to rise. However, as demand continues to increase, competitive challenges remain. Cost control measures are necessary to maintain profitability amid rising delivery and labor costs. Executives in the foodservice-focused industry subsegment identify investments in automation (among other factors) as one way to maintain a competitive position in the industry. Significant future capital expenditures tend to impact valuations when such expenditures become known to the investor community.

Valuation Multiples

Figures 2 and 3 provide a view into the historical trend in valuation multiples (revenue and EBITDA).

Historical trend of median revenue multiples
Historical trend of median EBITDA multiples

Revenue and EBITDA multiples increased over the last several years to 2020 and then declined in 2021 and the LTM period. We will explore the factors that appear to be impacting valuation multiples in the industry.

The Growth Story

Growth often has a strong influence on how companies are valued. Figures 4 and 5 below present a summary of the consensus forecasts for each group. Note that “NFY” means next fiscal year; NFY (blue line) = calendar 2022 for most companies, NFY (orange line) = calendar 2021 for most companies. “Current year” means June 30, 2022, while “prior year” means June 30, 2021.

Historical and projected revenue growth trend (current year vs. prior year)
Historical and projected EBITDA growth trend (current year vs. prior year)

The orange line in Figures 4 and 5 represents data as of June 30, 2021. At that time, the industry expected substantial revenue and EBITDA growth through 2023. Actual results for 2021 (as seen in the blue line) were in line with those expectations. However, 2022 and 2023 performance is expected to exceed prior projections (especially in EBITDA growth).

We looked to identify meaningful relationships between growth and observed revenue and EBITDA multiples. Companies with more robust projected revenue growth rates generally traded at higher valuation multiples – Figures 6 and 7 present this relationship.

Chart plotting LTM revenue multiples vs. projected revenue growth
Chart plotting LTM EBITDA multiples vs. projected EBITDA growth rates

Figures 6 and 7 show that the lowest valuation multiples are associated with the lowest projected growth rates.

See also: Need to prepare financial statement projections? See A Practical Guide to Financial Statement Forecasts for Business Valuations.

The Size Story

Larger companies are generally perceived to have lower levels of risk relative to smaller companies. This dynamic can be due to several factors, including improved product or geographic diversification, deeper management teams, access to various distribution channels, and better availability of capital.

Figure 8 presents each company’s market capitalizations plotted against its respective LTM revenue multiple.

LTM revenue multiples vs. market capitalization

Based on Figure 8, size did not appear to have a measurable impact on valuation multiples.

The Profitability Story

Revenue multiples are typically heavily influenced by profitability. We usually observe higher revenue multiples in companies with higher levels of profitability. In this case, NFY revenue multiples appeared correlated with projected margins. Figure 9 presents this relationship.

NFY revenue multiples vs. projected EBITDA margins

The relationship between profitability and revenue multiples appears to stick for most companies in the group.

The Leverage Story

Debt usage tends to increase financial risk to equity holders. Debt holders have a senior position within a company’s capital structure, and debt servicing occurs before any cash flow benefits (i.e., dividends) are issued to equity holders. Figure 10 plots LTM revenue multiples against their associated debt to total capital ratios.

LTM revenue multiples vs. Debt-to-Total Capital Ratios

Figure 10 indicates some correlation between revenue multiples and financial leverage.

Tying it All Together

The trends observed in this article suggest that investors are considering multiple factors to value the publicly-traded food distributors. A summary of the observations in this article is presented below and compared to our analysis as of December 2021.

Summary of various factors and their impact on valuation multiples

In general, the financial metrics impacting valuations remained consistent from the end of 2021 to June 2022. I hope you found this analysis helpful. Any input, feedback, suggestions, and questions (including disagreements with my high-level analysis) are welcome! Thanks for reading.

***

ValuAnalytics’ proprietary valuation analytics platform powered the quantitative industry analytics shown in this analysis. If you are a private equity firm looking to streamline your mark-to-market analyses at a cost-effective price or a business executive trying to benchmark your company against its peers, we are here to help. ValuAnalytics provides cost-effective, expert-level valuation analytics to give you the insight you need to make better-informed decisions around valuation. Click Request Service to get started.